1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. (1) On November 5, 1981, the Plaintiff joined the Defendant and served as C from February 10, 2006, when the Plaintiff entered the Defendant. (2) On November 13, 2003, the Plaintiff offered KRW 10 million to the Chairperson of the Bank Federation by soliciting the Chairman of the Board of Audit and Inspection to become a Vice Director of the Bank Federation in favor of the Chairman of the Board of Audit and Inspection at the time of November 13, 2003. (3) The Plaintiff received KRW 10 million from the third village of the Plaintiff, and then returned to E the above KRW 10 million from November 10, 200.

3) On February 21, 2006, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office on the charge of breach of trust against the F that “F received KRW 30 million or KRW 50 million from E, along with an illegal solicitation that F, the representative of the Defendant at the time of the investigation, would assist the appointment of the Deputy Director at the end of January 8, 2004,” and that F received KRW 30 million or KRW 50 million from E, on the ground that there is insufficient evidence to support the portion that F received KRW 30 million or KRW 50 million from E, but during the investigation process, it was clearly stated that E was to receive KRW 10 million or KRW 10 million from F, and that E was to receive a summary order on May 8, 2006, and the Defendant was subject to the above disposition of breach of trust against E on the ground that E was subject to the above disposition of dismissal on the ground that E was subject to a summary order on July 1, 2006.

B. On July 14, 2006, the Defendant of the first disciplinary action of this case acknowledged that “The Plaintiff provided money to the F Director to be recommended as a Vice-President candidate” was used as plannedly and repeatedly for the benefit of his personnel by threatening the personnel authority for two years without officially notifying the general secretary in charge of criminal accusation or punishment for employees and the audit office, even though he became aware of the fact that the head of E provided money to the F Director in order to be recommended as a Vice-President candidate, and by threatening the personnel authority for two years. In particular, the fact of recognition was known to the relevant agency after two years, thereby impairing the Defendant’s reputation and impairing the order of the F Director.”