logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2016.11.29 2015고단989
근로기준법위반등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of two years and four months;

Of the facts charged in this case, it is against D No. 2015 Godan989.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

“2015 Highest 989: Defendant A

1. The Defendant is the representative director of (ju) G in Gyeongnam-gun, and the actual operator of I located in H at Si-si in Gyeongnam-gun, who runs the vessel processing business using 25 full-time workers. A.

(1) The Defendant committed a crime against G workers in violation of the Labor Standards Act. (1) The Defendant did not pay KRW 24,929,490, total amount of eight retired workers within 14 days from the date of each retirement without agreement on extension of the due date between the parties, as stated in attached Form 2 through 9, as well as KRW 2,769,230 of the J’s wages (including KRW 2,769,230 of the J’s wages) retired from office, from January 2, 2015 to February 28, 2015, as well as KRW 24,929,490, total amount of eight retired workers from office, within 14 days from the date of each retirement, from March 10, 2014 to April 10, 2015, the Defendant did not pay KRW 19,004,470 of K’s wages from March 19, 2015 to the date of each retirement worker.

B. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits Act: (a) the Defendant worked as the chief of the accuracy management division from March 6, 2014 to April 10, 2015; (b) and (c) was employed as the chief of the accuracy management division from March 10, 2014 to April 10, 2015; and (d) the Defendant did not pay KRW 8,290,189, total sum of retirement allowances of two retired workers, including K’s retirement allowances of KRW 4,078,767, from March 10, 2014 to April 10, 2015, within 14 days from each retirement date without any agreement on the extension of the due date between the parties.

“2015 Highest 1128: Defendants

2. (State)G-related criminal defendant A is an employer who runs a vessel processing business using 25 full time workers in the name of (State)G as described in paragraph 1.

Defendant

A worked in the same workplace from January 2, 2015 to April 1, 2015.

arrow