1. The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) on April 16, 2015 regarding each real estate listed in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant.

On April 16, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with the Defendant on the following: (a) KRW 950 million for the purchase price; and (b) KRW 100 million for the intermediate payment of KRW 100 million for the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”); and (c) concluded a sales contract with the Plaintiff on July 16, 2015 for the payment of the remainder KRW 750 million on May 29, 2015 and the remainder KRW 750 million on July 16, 201

(hereinafter “instant contract”). On May 29, 2015, the Defendant paid the Plaintiff KRW 100 million of the down payment, and around June 2015, paid KRW 50 million of the intermediate payment.

On July 30, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for revocation of the decision of provisional seizure on July 30, 2015 with respect to the registration of provisional seizure established in the real estate listed in the No. 1 of the Attached List No. 1, and revoked the registration of provisional seizure on October 6, 2016 upon receipt of the award decision on July 1, 2016.

On December 23, 2016, the Plaintiff sent a certification of content to the Defendant, and notified the Plaintiff that “The Plaintiff shall also pay the remainder of the purchase price within one week from the date of receipt of the notification, and the Defendant shall also pay the remainder of the purchase price, if the purchase price is not paid due to the implementation and repayment of the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer of each of the instant real estate within one week from the date of receipt of the notification of the notification of the notification.”

The above content-certified mail reached the Defendant on December 26, 2016.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (Evidence with Serial Number includes Serial Number), purport of the whole pleadings, and purport of the whole pleadings) and the argument of the parties to the determination, the plaintiff asserted the parties to the determination, upon cancelling the registration of provisional seizure established in the real estate No. 1 of the attached Table No. 1 pursuant to the contract of this case, the plaintiff completed the provision of the performance by demanding the defendant to pay the balance and receive documents necessary for

Therefore, the defendant.