Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.

However, as to the Defendants, this is against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person with no certain occupation, Defendant B is a marina employee, and the person who was a workplace, and the Defendants gather money from the calculating machine located in the Kabter between the name of the person entering the convenience store around April 2019 and leaving the convenience store and inducing the employees of the convenience store.

Defendant

A around 02:39 on April 29, 2019, around 02:0, at the “D convenience store” located in Yasan City, the victim E, who is an employee of the customer, pretended to search for the beer in Japan, and entices the victim to the air conditioners. The defendant B opened a credit cooperative in the knifter between the victim and the knife, and 500,000,000 won in cash.

As a result, the defendants stolen the property managed by the victim together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. E statements;

1. Application of CCTV video-related Acts and subordinate statutes to convenience stores;

1. Article 331 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of each community service order;

1. Scope of punishment by law: One to ten years of imprisonment;

2. The scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines [the determination of types] (the second sentence] general larceny [the special person] - mitigated factors: where the crime is systematically divided (except for habitual offenders) [the scope of recommendations and recommendations] basic area, imprisonment for six months to one year [the scope of recommendations corrected by applicable sentences] for one year and one year and six months (the lowest limit of applicable sentences recommended by the sentencing guidelines in law are inconsistent with the minimum limit of applicable sentences in law, so the lowest limit of applicable sentences in law is inconsistent with the applicable sentences] - The aggravated factors are combined with two or more persons [the grounds for suspension of execution] - The major pride factors: living.