The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, 40 hours of attending the law-abiding lecture, and 160 hours of community service) is too unhued;

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the judgment of the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). Based on the foregoing legal doctrine, there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared to the lower court’s judgment, and comprehensively considering the factors revealed in the proceedings of the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing cannot be deemed to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion because the sentencing of the lower court is too low.

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.