logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.07.05 2018누38170
정보공개거부처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The court of first instance rejected the part of the instant lawsuit seeking revocation of the decision of non-disclosure of information listed in attached Table 1 among the instant lawsuit, and accepted the claim for revocation of the remaining part of the information except the information listed in attached Table 3 among the decision of non-disclosure of information listed in attached Table 2.

As a result, the part against the plaintiff in the judgment of the court of first instance is excluded from the object of the judgment of this court.

2. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the reasoning of the judgment, is as stated in Paragraph (3) of the judgment of the court of first instance, as to the claim for revocation of the non-disclosure decision regarding the information stated in Attached Table 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation

3. The claim for cancellation of the decision for non-disclosure of information listed in attached Table 2 shall be accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow