logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.11.26 2014나52621
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties 1) Defendant D is the net F (G students, hereinafter “the network”).

Defendant E is a doctor who performs a simple surgery with respect to the deceased, and Defendant Seoul National University Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

(2) The plaintiff A is the deceased's wife, and the plaintiff B and C are the children of the deceased.

B. 1) On May 13, 2009, the Deceased was admitted to the H Hospital located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the condition that the two symptoms were mainly shown, and on May 16, 2009, the deceased was solicited to have all of the hospitals with a low lebal climatic value as a result of blood examination. (2) On May 16, 2009, the deceased was hospitalized into the Mangsan Hospital at Mang University on May 16, 2009; (3) on the condition that the inter-pactic function was reduced and the massazotia, and the compounds containing nitrogen are too large in blood. In the process, the deceased was diagnosed as “pacta-type A-type infection and acute marral marology.”

On May 17, 2009, the Deceased was transferred to the Defendant Hospital on the ground that “The state of food is a dead person, but there is a possibility of simple erosion.”

C. On May 17, 2009, the Deceased arrived at the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital on May 12:58, 2009, on the following grounds: (a) the Deceased’s progress at the Defendant Hospital: (b) the time of arrival; (c) the Deceased’s first-aid staff and treatment; and (d) on May 17, 2009, the Deceased arrived at the Defendant Hospital’s emergency room; (c) there was no particular symptoms other than the overall brush;

B) The medical personnel in the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital conducted internal medicine testing (general blood test, response test, liver infection test, heart test, X-ray test, etc.) on the deceased. Meanwhile, the deceased administered a single type of protective device, which is a kind of protective device, for the purpose of preservation of acute A-type and acute new technology. As a result of the examination, as a result of the examination, the medical personnel in the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital verified the medical opinion of low calcium infection, the calcium was injected and injected, and ordered the deceased to take a calcium medicine, and he instructed the deceased to take a calcium medicine.

arrow