logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.11.27 2015나54771
손해배상(자)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. At around 23:00 on July 11, 2014, the Plaintiffs, as married couple, boarded the Plaintiff’s C New Flad Automobiles owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant damaged vehicles”) and stopped on the road near the landing place in the Yannam-gun, Seonam-gun, Seonam-gun, Seonam-gun, the Plaintiff left the instant damaged vehicles (hereinafter “instant damaged vehicles”). However, there was an accident where the vehicle stopped in front of the damaged vehicle and the front part of the damaged vehicle and the front part of the instant damaged vehicle were contacted.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

Plaintiff

A, on July 14, 2014, visited the hospital, complaining for pains, such as the neck and shoulder caused by the instant accident, and being hospitalized for one day and being hospitalized for approximately two weeks, issued a medical certificate to the effect that there is a satise of satise, tension, shoulder, and satise of satis in need of treatment for approximately two weeks, and then from July 16, 2014.

7. Until December 23, 200, the medical treatment was provided for eight days.

C. The Defendant, as an insurer who entered into the instant comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the instant sea vehicles, paid the Plaintiff KRW 291,520 for automobile repair costs and KRW 328,00 for indirect damage KRW 36,480 for automobile repair costs.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, 3-1 to 3, 4, and 6-6 of the evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' assertion that they suffered from injury such as salt, tension, etc. by the accident of this case. The plaintiff Eul suffered the same injury as the plaintiff Eul, or did not cause any injury to the plaintiff Eul, even if they did not have the same mental damage as that of the plaintiff Eul. Thus, the defendant, who is the insurer of the vehicle of this case, is liable to pay the plaintiff 2,00,000 won as consolation money for the accident of this case and damages for delay.

B. First of all, with respect to the Plaintiff’s claim, the health team, even though the Plaintiff’s request was diagnosed after the instant accident.

arrow