1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The court's explanation of this case by the court of the first instance as to this case is identical to the ground of the first instance judgment, except for the case where the plaintiff added a judgment on new arguments in the court of first instance under Paragraph (2) below, and thus, this case is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of

The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff's additional judgment was made by acquiring the first degree in Ethiopia, and worked as an instructor in a university for two years, and the university plays a political role in the Ethmpia, and does not guarantee the autonomous teachers' right to teach the reality of the nation's faced with the nation. The government maintains what kind of teaching instructors teach to the university by assigning executive officers to the university.

However, the Plaintiff received warnings several times on the ground that he was faced with Ethiopia.

The plaintiff is suspected of being involved in Ethiopia from the government. If the current political system of Ethiopia return to the home country before it is changed, the plaintiff will be sentenced to reduction of the house, adviser, or death penalty.

Ethiopia Government announced anti-terrorism names and thereby, it became possible to kill or guide ELLT personnel of the Party to be different from the position of the Party.

Since the plaintiff was prosecuted by the Ethiopia prosecution for listed on the list of designated recipients, if the plaintiff returned to his own country, it is likely that the plaintiff might be subject to gambling on the ground of his status as a member of a specific social group.

Judgment

On the other hand, the plaintiff's above assertion is asserted only after the application for refugee status was made in the refugee screening procedure or in the first instance trial procedure after the application for refugee status, and its credibility is doubtful, and evidence No. 5 submitted by the plaintiff in the first instance is also a written request to the Government of the Republic of Korea, which is a criminal requesting the delivery of the plaintiff to the Government of the Republic of Korea.