1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 5, 1929, with respect to the instant real estate in the registered titleholder’s name, registration of transfer was completed due to the recovery due to the trade on September 1, 1927 under the name of the deceased AE (Death on February 17, 2003), the deceased AF (Death on October 19, 1984), and the deceased AG (Death on May 15, 1996).

B. The Plaintiff in possession has occupied the instant real estate from March 3, 1983 with the deceased H’s children.

C. (i) On February 17, 2003, the deceased on February 17, 2003, the deceased on the part of Defendant H, L, M, N,O, and the deceased’s wife of the deceased, Defendant I, Defendant J and K, the children of the deceased AH, were jointly inherited by Defendant J and K.

on October 19, 1984, the Luxembourg died and jointly succeeded by the Defendant P, his children, Defendant P, Defendant Y, Y, Z, Z, AA, and K. The network AI died on December 13, 2006 and jointly succeeded by Defendant Q, his children, Defendant R, and S. The network AJ died on July 24, 1995, and jointly succeeded by Defendant C, V, W, and X, his children.

Consolidated AG died on May 15, 1996 and jointly succeeded by Defendant AD and AC, their children.

In addition, the deceased on April 23, 2014, after the filing of the instant lawsuit, the deceased on April 23, 2014, and the plaintiff C, D, E, and F, who are his or her wife B, and their children, jointly inherited.

2. The parties' assertion

A. The summary of the plaintiffs' assertion: He purchased the instant real estate from the net AE, AF, and AG, and occupied and used it without completing the registration of ownership transfer; on March 3, 1983, H died and succeeded to the deceased on the deceased on March 3, 1983; the network A was openly occupied the instant real estate as its owner’s intention from the date of the above H’s death to the date of his death; thus, the prescriptive acquisition of the instant real estate was completed on March 3, 2003 after the lapse of 20 years thereafter.

B. The main point of the Defendants’ assertion is that the real estate in this case was used as a starting answer, which is the ownership of the AL species (hereinafter “the non-permanent clan”), and the net H of the deceased Party H is the starting answer.