logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.11.23 2016고단3060
공무집행방해
Text

Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.

Reasons

At around 04:40 on May 20, 2016, the Defendant in the factory room of the No. S. S. S.: (a) sent to the police officer E, who was reported by the taxi engineer and the taxi engineer on the street in front of the “D” located in O.S., in order to keep the taxi engineer from gathering the string of the string, such as “the string of the string, the string of the string, the arrest, and the string of the string, the string and the string of the string of the string, the string of the string, and the string of the string, the string of the string and the string of the string, who continued to have the string of the string of the string,

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers dispatched after receiving a report.

According to the records of personal history, the following facts and circumstances are recognized:

A. At the time, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, performed taxi drivers and trial expenses, and the slope E and the compact F were dispatched to the scene on May 20, 2016 according to the 112 report received on May 20, 2016.

B. At the time of the instant disposition, the Defendant paid a fare to a taxi driver, and thereafter started to engage in an act of sway E with sound against the slope E who solicits the Plaintiff to return home, and around 04:46 May 20, 2016, the police officer F issued a notice to the Defendant that he/she engaged in an act of disturbance of drinking alcohol under Article 3(1)20 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (hereinafter “the first notice disposition”). C. The Defendant continued to engage in the same act against slope E after the first notice disposition, and on May 20, 2016, the police officer F issued a notice disposition under the above provision of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (hereinafter “the second notice disposition”).

On May 20, 2016, at around 05:00, the Defendant: (a) loaded a defective vehicle with a slope E boarding the patrol vehicle and intending to depart from the patrol vehicle; (b) obstructed it; (c) obstructed the face of the following slope E, and continuously pushed the smoke of tobacco, and (d) the Defendant is a flagrant offender of the obstruction of performance of official duties.

arrow