logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원목포지원 2015.08.25 2014가단55206
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs are the parents of the network D (hereinafter “the network”). The Defendant is the operator of E dump trucks (hereinafter “instant truck”) and the Plaintiff is a limited liability company which is the user of F, and an insurance company that concluded an automobile damage insurance contract regarding damages arising from accidents during the operation of the instant truck.

B. On or after December 7, 201, F driven the instant truck on or after December 05:35, 201, and turned to the left at the intersection of a three-lane intersection in front of the front of the front Yong-gun, Yong-gun, Yong-gun, Yong-gun, the front-gun, at the right corner, and was trying to enter the four-lane road in the right corners of the Y. The two-lanes of the instant truck at the right corners of the front cover of the front cover of the instant truck (hereinafter “instant accident”), and the detailed form at the time of the accident is as shown in the annexed sheet.

C. The Deceased died due to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3 (including paper numbers), Gap evidence 5-3 through 5, Eul evidence 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Plaintiff’s assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant accident occurred due to the unilateral negligence in violation of F’s signal signal or the negligence in violation of F’s duty to avoid the occurrence of the accident, and thus, the Defendant, as the insurer of the instant truck, is liable to compensate the Plaintiffs, who are the deceased and their

B. On the grounds delineated below, it is not sufficient to recognize F’s violation of the F’s signal signals only with the entries of Gap evidence 5-5-22, Gap evidence 6-2, and the fact inquiry results with respect to the head of Young Cancer police station, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

(1) The signal cycles indicated in subparagraph 5-10 and the head of the Young Cancer Police Station indicated in subparagraph 5-10 shall be dated August 18, 2015.

arrow