1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff imported a glass master (Sirr; hereinafter referred to as the “instant product”) for manufacturing glass, such as TFT-ELD (TFT-LS) products from February 22, 2008 to March 15, 2010, which is used to disrupt the glass in the current state of melting the above melting process during the period from February 22, 2008, while importing a glass master (hereinafter referred to as the “instant product”). The Plaintiff imported a tariff classification of the product number K 8479.82-4000 (basic duty rate of 8%) under the Tariff Schedules [Attachment Table] of the Customs Duties Act, which was combined with the import declaration number of 2067-08-007-007312 and other 62 items, and as a result, the Plaintiff paid customs duties, customs duties, customs duties, customs duties, customs duties, and customs duties, customs duties, customs duties, customs duties, customs duties, and customs, customs duties, and customs, customs, totaling KRW 201,281,208

B. On September 21, 2009, the Plaintiff asserted that the Korea Customs Service’s Customs Classification Board of Steel Products determined the product number of HSK 8474.39-000 (0% tariff concession rate) as the product number of HS 8474.39-000 (the 10th tariff classification council in 2009) under the tariff schedule classified as “mixer” (the tariff classification council) of steel product of this case should be classified as HS 8474.39-000 (0% tariff concession rate) as the product number of HS 8474.39-000 (the tariff concession rate of 0%) as well as the product number of HS 840% as the product number of HS 84 in the process of filing a request for correction from February 19, 2010 to July 8, 2010.

hereinafter referred to as "the case."