logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.09.30 2016고단5509
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operated “C” from around 2005 to October 2010 in Net City B.

1. The defendant operated on February 18, 2008 by the defendant who is in the Yacheon City B.

C At Schlage, the victim made a false statement to the victim D that “E father lend money necessary to study abroad.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was aware of the repayment of interest on other debts with money, and the Defendant was not able to repay his/her debt with money because he/she was not able to do so, and thus, he/she did not have any intent or ability to repay the interest even if he/she borrowed money from the injured party.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 3 million won from the injured party for the purpose of borrowing money from the seat to the third party.

2. On July 1, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D, stating that “The president would lend money that the president would have to pay to the victim.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was aware of the repayment of interest on other debts with money, and the Defendant was not able to repay his/her debt with money because he/she was not able to do so, and thus, he/she did not have any intent or ability to repay the interest even if he/she borrowed money from the injured party.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 7 million won from the victim, who is the victim, to receive 7 million won as the borrowed money from the victim.

3. Around October 27, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim G, stating, “Around October 27, 2008, the Defendant borrowed money from the victim G to help them make a default.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was aware of the repayment of interest on other debts with money, and the Defendant was not able to repay his/her debt with money because he/she was not able to do so, and thus, he/she did not have any intent or ability to repay the interest even if he/she borrowed money from the injured party.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such.

arrow