1. The Defendant: (a) against Plaintiff A, KRW 11,78,852, Plaintiff B, and C, respectively, and each of the said amounts on November 13, 2014.

1. Basic facts

A. E is the father of Plaintiff A, who is the father of Plaintiff B and C, and is the father of the deceased F, who is the father of Plaintiff B and C, who is the plaintiff B and C.

B. On May 22, 1985, Plaintiff A is the owner who completed each registration of ownership transfer with respect to 3,170 square meters of G Seo-gu, Seo-gu and H 1,263 square meters of land (hereinafter “I land”). Plaintiff B and C are the owners of 1/2 each of the owners who completed each registration of ownership transfer with respect to 2,086 square meters of land J-gu, Gwangju Mine-gu, and 2,086 square meters of land, K 2,271 square meters of land, L 60 square meters of land, and M 516 square meters of land (hereinafter “N land”).

(c) Korea has completed each registration of transfer of ownership on July 20, 201, on the ground of an agreement on the acquisition of land for public use on July 18, 201 by July 28, 201, on the ground of an agreement on the acquisition of land for public use on July 28, 201.

The Korea Rural Community Corporation paid 19,631,420 won to the Defendant with compensation for farming loss, and 20,305,410 won to the N land.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 5 (including branch numbers), Eul evidence No. 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The defendant's determination as to the authenticity of Gap's evidence No. 4 (the terms of a contract for the return for farm use, hereinafter referred to as "the contract of this case") is the same as his/her seal affixed to the contract of this case, but the defendant argues that the defendant did not affix his/her seal to the contract of this case and it was forged or altered by theO.

If the stamp image of a holder of a title deed in which the seal is affixed on a private document is reproduced by his/her seal, barring special circumstances, it shall be presumed that the authenticity of the stamp image is created, that is, the act of affixing the seal is based on the will of the holder of the title deed. Once the authenticity of the stamp image is presumed, the authenticity of the document shall be presumed in accordance with Article 329 of the Civil Procedure Act, but such presumption is revealed that the act of affixing the seal was made by a person other