1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases: therefore, it shall be accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

ARTICLE 3-

B. 3) (4) (4) (5 to 13) parts are cut down as follows. 3) Overwork and stress are different from the cromatic hepatitis. There is no proof that overwork or stress may cause the cromatic hepatitis (A). The purport of the Plaintiff’s opinion of the doctor of the Central Veterans Hospital (A. 23) presented as evidence that “the Plaintiff may cause the cromatic hepatitis,” but this is merely an indefinite presumption, and it is difficult to believe that there is no objective ground for it. The cromatic infection, which is the cause of the cromatic hepatitis, causes the patient’s death only two to three days of the outbreak. The possibility that the cromatic or stress might have a significant impact on the rapid progress. Although the deceased had undergone serious fault or stress, it is difficult to deem that the cromatic infection overlaps with the cromatic infection or 2017.”

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.