1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. In full view of the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence No. 3, it is recognized that the plaintiff and the defendant entered into a lease agreement of KRW 50,000,000 on June 29, 2018 with respect to Seongbuk-gu Seoul and the third floor (three banks) in Seongbuk-gu Seoul on June 30, 2016, and KRW 50,000,000 for deposit money, monthly rent of KRW 70,000 (the following lease agreement of this case).

2. Determination

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion No. 3 is a lease agreement that was prepared by the Plaintiff to extend the period of six months from the termination of the previous lease agreement.

The defendant promised to return the lease deposit when he talks only two months prior to the contract period regardless of the contract period.

On March 15, 2017, the Plaintiff notified the Plaintiff of the scheduled return of the deposit for lease on the ground that the Plaintiff would be a director on March 15, 2017, and was a director on March 27, 2017.

Since the instant lease contract was terminated, the Defendant is obligated to return the deposit amount of KRW 50,000,000 to the Plaintiff.

B. The evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the instant lease contract was terminated, and there is no evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

The plaintiff's assertion based on the premise that the lease contract is terminated cannot be accepted.

3. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.