logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.05.25 2016고단798
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged and the defendant's assertion

A. On May 2015, the Defendant: (a) provided, without compensation, approximately 0.03g of the Memphere for administration once in a white letter bag to E, from the D gas station located in Gangseo-gu Busan, Gangseo-gu, Busan; (b) the Defendant: (c) provided the Memphere bag for a white letter bag.

B. The Defendant alleged that he was aware of the E, which is working in relation to used goods through F, and there was a call or call for the purchase of E and office office fixtures, and there was no delivery of mert clops to E (hereinafter “propops”).

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, namely, E, from the police investigation, received approximately 0.03 g of philopon from the Defendant on May 6, 2015.

However, this court stated that there was a fact that the defendant had met at the time of the above date, but did not receive philophones.

(2) On the other hand, in this court, E promises the Defendant to take notes from the Defendant at the time of the above date, but he was in a state where E had already taken the administration of phiphones, and this form was left back without giving the phiphones.

According to the call details data between the Defendant and E, etc., the Defendant appears to have met around May 5, 2015. However, the Defendant, at the time, made several calls or met with respect to the purchase of the office supplies of E and E in which the used goods are mediated, and the testimony of F is consistent with the above argument of the Defendant, E was made in the testimony, and E was exchanged with the Defendant in connection with the brokerage of the used goods, and there was contact with the Defendant in connection with the Defendant and the used goods, and the Defendant was also requested to call ten computers from the Defendant.

arrow