logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.03.23 2016가합22116
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendant B is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant C is dismissed.

3...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company operating mechanical equipment construction business, etc., and Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is a company operating solar power installation business, etc., and Defendant C is the representative director of the Defendant Company.

B. The Defendant Company was awarded a contract for the construction of solar power plants (hereinafter “the construction of solar power plants”) to the installation of solar power plants 1 and 2 (7.5MWp) (hereinafter “the construction of solar power plants”) and to the installation of solar power plants (1,96.9KWp) at the installation of solar power plants (hereinafter “the construction of solar power plants”) at the outside of Seosan-si, Inc. D Co., Ltd. and at the outside of Daegu-gu, Y-gu and three (3) places (hereinafter “the construction of

C. On May 1, 2014, the Plaintiff concluded a contract with Defendant Company to install electrical construction and solar structures among the construction works for the construction of solar power plants, and completed all installation works on September 30, 2014 among the construction works for the construction works for the Isolar power plants on July 4, 2014.

【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap evidence 1-2, Gap evidence 2-1 and 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The Defendant Company’s claim for the payment of the construction cost against the Defendant Company is obligated to pay the total of KRW 3.477 billion (i.e., the total construction cost of KRW 1.2375 million, which is KRW 1.375 million, as the total construction cost of KRW 1.375 million, among the construction cost for the construction of the solar power plant, KRW 1.357 million, the total construction cost of KRW 1.357 billion, which is KRW 1.375 million, is paid (i.e., the total construction cost of KRW 3., KRW 3.3 billion). As such, the Defendant Company sought KRW 15 million, which is the total construction cost of KRW 1.2875 million, which is unpaid to the Plaintiff, but is erroneous in calculation.

(i) (i) 3.47 billion won - 3.35 billion won - 3.35 billion won) and damages for delay are liable to pay them.

B. The Plaintiff filed a loan claim against Defendant C (i.e., KRW 200 million on May 30, 2014) with Defendant C lent a total of KRW 100 million to Defendant C (i.e., KRW 100 million on June 13, 2014).

arrow