The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence (five million won in penalty) that the court below rendered by the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unhutiled and unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is acknowledged that the Defendant assaulted a police officer who performed official duties to obstruct the performance of official duties, and thus requires strict punishment in light of the recent public power trend, such as: (a) the Defendant has been punished on several occasions; (b) the Defendant has been punished by a fine on several occasions; (c) there has been a history of having been punished by suspended execution; and (d) the fact that the Defendant did not receive a letter from a

However, considering the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant pleadings, such as the circumstances after the instant crime, the lower court’s punishment is too uneasible and unreasonable.

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.