logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2013.10.16 2013고단1055
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 11:00 on May 3, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed an act of buying child and juvenile sex at a Moel where it is difficult to know the trade name near C located in Jeju-si; (b) obtained from “D”, a smartphone-rating pole; and (c) made a single sexual intercourse with “D”; and (d) granted the above E in return, KRW 100,000 to purchase child and juvenile sex.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements concerning E;

1. Article 10 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (amended by Act No. 11574, Dec. 18, 2012; hereinafter the same shall apply) that is the basis for the relevant criminal facts and for the selection of punishment,

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The main sentence of Article 13 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. Where a conviction of a defendant who has registered personal information of this case under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act becomes final and conclusive, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information pursuant to Article 33(1) of the former Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, Articles 42 and 43 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and Articles 4(2) and 5 of the Addenda, and is obliged to submit personal information to the competent authority.

However, since the defendant is sentenced to a fine as ordered, the above order to disclose personal information shall not be issued.

The reason for sentencing is that the defendant confessions all of the crimes of this case and reflects his mistake.

However, even though the crime of this case is a mature citizen who is an adult male with the family, and has to protect and sentence the juvenile, it is not very good to purchase the sex of 13 years of age through mobile phone fishing, and such sex offense is highly harmful to the juvenile, and it is necessary to severely punish the juvenile with a sound sexual attitude.

arrow