The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The Korean Criminal Procedure Act, which takes the principle of trial priority and the principle of directness on the market, has a unique area of sentencing in the first instance, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the first instance court’s sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). There is no significant change in the terms and conditions of sentencing compared to the original judgment because of the lack of special new sentencing data in the trial of the competent court. In full view of the sentencing grounds (the fact that the instant crime was committed even after the revocation of the driver’s license in 2013) revealed in the oral proceedings of the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing is too excessive and goes beyond the reasonable scope of discretion, and thus, cannot be said to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

3. The appeal by the defendant is without merit and thus dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.