1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B’s KRW 39,673,021 as well as 5% per annum from June 22, 2017 to October 16, 2019.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendants were unable to engage in financial investment business, such as an ordinary investment trading business or an investment brokerage business, without authorization from the Financial Services Commission, and were not capable of actually making an investment. The Defendants merely deal with the computerized processing that deducts a considerable amount of the purchase price of virtual products from the deposit and re-Accumulation of the deposit the amount calculated by deducting the purchase price and the fee for sales at the time of purchase from the deposit in an amount equivalent to the sale price, and thus, did not actually intend to make an investment in financial investment instruments. However, even though they did not intend to make an investment in financial investment instruments, around July 2012, through transactions linked with the real-time market price of domestic and overseas financial investment instruments such as foreign currencies, precious metals, natural gas, crude oil, domestic gifts, domestic gifts, domestic gifts, and domestic stocks, which are normally conducted through transactions that are linked with the real-time market price of stocks, and received deposits for purchase from their members (hereinafter “D, E, F, andG”).

B. In the process, Defendant B, as a general manager, took charge of the operation of each site of this case’s domestic and foreign futures and stock trading sites in Thailand and throughout Thailand, and Defendant C took charge of pre-inspection of stocks and futures option investment services, the development of sites and services for stock and futures trading, the development of HTS (HTS) program, the overall customer management, inquiries related to real transactions, response to customer claims against high-income member restrictions, etc., the performance of a test for program errors inspection, analysis of trading methods and opinions of members subject to restrictions on contract acceptance, and the final response to customer claims against customers.

C. The Plaintiff is normally invested on each site of this case.