logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.04.18 2013고단2624
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B car.

On October 20, 2013, the Defendant driven the above car at a speed of about 30 km from the justmian to the speed of about 30 km of the two-lane road in front of the old hotel located in the Chungcheong-dong at the time of leisure.

At this point, there was a crosswalk without signal lights, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to confirm whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a way to reduce the speed and to see it well, and to safely drive the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive the crosswalk while driving the crosswalk on the right side of the said vehicle, and did not immediately avoid the remainder of the victim C (Nam, 70 years of age) who was crossing the crosswalk from the left side of the said vehicle, and did not keep the victim’s right side part of the said vehicle, and caused the victim’s injury, such as T8lleys and the structural frame of the closed non-permanent body body, for about 12 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A traffic accident occurrence report;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition in view of the following: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is against the defendant; (b) the victim submitted an application for coaling the defendant’s wife; and (c) the victim appears to have endeavored to recover from damage.

arrow