1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the real estate stated in the attached list.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

Judgment on the Grounds of Claim

A. On November 26, 2018, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with respect to the real estate listed in the separate sheet owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant real estate”) until November 26, 2020, which constitutes a lease deposit of KRW 30,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 3,000,000 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) and that the Defendant occupied and occupied the instant real estate and used it by the Defendant. The fact that the Defendant did not pay only one rent to the Plaintiff until then, the fact that the Plaintiff sent a letter verifying that the instant lease agreement was terminated on November 5, 2019, and that the business Defendant received it by the Plaintiff does not conflict between the parties, or that it was recognized by adding the entire purport of the pleadings to the items listed in subparagraphs A and 2.

B. According to the facts of the judgment above, since the lease contract of this case was lawfully terminated, the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate of this case to the plaintiff as restitution following the termination of the lease contract of this case.

2. The defendant's assertion that it is necessary to confirm the security deposit, rent, and other matters. However, it is apparent that the defendant's unpaid car is much more superior than the security deposit, and there is no evidence of assertion as to the contents necessary for the confirmation. Thus, the defendant's argument is without merit without any need to further examine.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.