Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the driving of BCA100 Obaba.

On April 17, 2016, the Defendant driven the off-line 01:27, and driven the off-line 10 lanes in order to drive the off-line 259 in the Seoul Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the three-lanes in front of the exit of the 10-lane 259 in the direction of the male air space from the side of the waterside to the 40-km speed.

At the time of night, there was no good view for the view of the road, and there was a milch on the four-lanes adjacent to the sidewalk as well as the environment in which many automobiles are standing and stopping on the road at any time. In such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents due to reducing the speed of the motor vehicle and closely manipulating the steering system, brakes, etc., by accurately manipulating the steering system and the steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the above duty of care and went into operation as it is, due to negligence, found the victim C(55 years old) left from the right side of the above oto the port from the above oto the left side of the direction of the otoba, but did not reach the above oba, and received the victim from the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendant caused the victim to die of severe cerebrovascular and cerebral cerebrovascular in the Central University Hospital located in 102, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, which had been under medical treatment at around 17:06 on April 22, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. 교통사고보고⑴⑵

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a death certificate;

1. Applicable provisions of Acts to criminal facts and Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Selection and Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and selection of treasury penalties

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that it appears that the victim seems to be in conflict with each other, and that the bereaved family members are not punished by the defendant, etc. by mutual agreement with the victim);