1. The Defendant’s KRW 50,000,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual interest thereon from November 9, 2018 to September 10, 2020.

1. The plaintiff is a legally married couple who completed the marriage report on November 25, 1994, and two children were employed between C and C.

From around 2011, the defendant committed a fraudulent act with C, and around November 2012, the defendant has given birth to and took care of the married child between C and C.

C around December 2012, the defendant had the defendant move into an apartment in the same apartment complex as his mother's apartment, and the plaintiff and the mother were living in the house living together with the mother's residence and the defendant's residence from that time on the ground that the mother was living around February 2013.

C filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff on divorce and division of property, etc. against the Daegu Family Court. On October 26, 2016, the above court rendered a judgment dismissing C’s claim on the ground that “Evidence submitted by C alone is insufficient to recognize that C had a marital relationship between C and the Plaintiff or that there was a judicial reason, as asserted by C,” and the above judgment became final and conclusive.

C On March 2018, 2018, the first police officer asserted that “the Plaintiff, around 2011, found the philosolosophical hall and considered the death between the Plaintiff and another male.” The Plaintiff forced the Plaintiff to commit an unlawful act.

C, the plaintiff and the plaintiff's mother found the above philosophical hall operated by D on March 8, 2018, and they confirmed D that D would know the plaintiff well.

The plaintiff and the mother of the plaintiff became aware of the relationship between C and the defendant in the course of pursuing the background leading up to the above argument.

On May 2018, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Defendant, stating that “The Plaintiff committed a fraudulent act against C, thereby impairing the Plaintiff’s reputation by pointing out false facts that the Plaintiff committed a fraudulent act,” and the Defendant also filed a complaint with the Plaintiff claiming that “the Plaintiff was not guilty.” However, the Plaintiff and the Defendant received a disposition of non-prosecution.

D. (f) During the investigation process of the two cases described in this paragraph, and in this Court.