The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the court of first instance, which maintained the reasoning of the judgment, the court below is just in holding that the court below convicted all of the events of the above investigation document as to the preparation of qualification specifications, display of qualification specifications documents, victim I, L, and ABF Capital among the facts charged in the instant case, fraud against the victim I, L, and ABF Capital, December 10, 201, fabrication of private documents as of February 16, 2012, forgery of private documents as of December 16, 2012, Dec. 10, 201, and February 17, 2012, as alleged in the grounds of appeal. In so doing, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.