logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.07.04 2017고단5641
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 04:00 on September 29, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol at C Hospital located in the Mayang-gun B; (b) the Defendant interfered with the duty of night duty at the hospital workers on night duty at the victim C Hospital by force, such as her chief director, Nara, the president of the hospital, Nara, and inside articles, and Do working there, for a large amount of 10 minutes per hour and 10 minutes of “the starting of the starting of the starting of the Event.”

2. The Defendant: (a) expressed that the chest of the Donyang Police Station Embridge, a police officer affiliated with the Donyang Police Station Embox, dispatched to the scene after having received a report on the foregoing date and time, at the same place; (b) expressed that “I am fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

3. Around 07:39 the above day, the Defendant was required to respond to the measurement of alcohol in such a way as to put the breath of alcohol into the breath of a breath of Sayang Police Station and the Jayang Police Station Ephath of Sayang Police Station Epha at the Jayang Police Station Office, and the Jayang Police Station Ephast of the Jayang Police Station Office, to the Defendant, on the ground that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driven under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling alcohol, making the breath of the face, and making

Nevertheless, the defendant explicitly expresses his intention to refuse to take a drinking test and refuses to take a drinking test so that he did not comply with a police officer's request for a drinking test without any justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Report on the circumstances of a driver involved in driving, report on the detection of a driver involved in driving, and inquiry about the results of crackdown on drinking;

1. Investigation report (related to the analysis of CCTV data in the C Hospital), investigation report (related to refusal to measure A drinking alcohol), investigation report (related to the situation of the principal driver), and investigation report;

arrow