All appeals by the prosecutor and the defendant are dismissed.

1. The prosecutor and the defendant asserts that the sentencing of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too minor or unreasonable.

2. According to the records of the judgment, there are two cases: (a) there are two previous charges against the Defendant; (b) some crimes are crimes during the period of probation; and (c) each of the crimes of this case cannot be viewed as simple and conclusive crimes of larceny and attempted larceny by vehicle hairs; and (d) victims have not recovered from damage.

However, the sentencing of the court below is deemed appropriate considering the overall circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, the growth environment, and the conditions before and after the crime, etc., which are relatively minor in the degree of damage in this case.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the prosecutor and the defendant is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.