The judgment below

Part of the compensation order, except the compensation order, shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although it was true that the Defendant borrowed money from the victims, the Defendant continued to pay interest to the victims, and did not have the maturity date for the borrowed money. Since the Defendant owned a store with real estate in the name of the Defendant and a store with a profit of 2 million won or more per month, there was no deception or intention.

However, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty is erroneous by misapprehending the legal principles.

⑵ 계불입금 사기 ㈎ 2013고단496호 (원심 판시 1의 나항 및 다항) 피고인은 H가 조직한 계에 계원으로 가입하였을 뿐이고, 따라서 피고인이 다른 계원들의 계불입금을 편취한 것이 아님에도, 이를 유죄로 판단한 원심판결에는 사실을 오인한 위법이 있다.

㈏ 2013고단611호 피고인이 피해자 M에게 계불입금을 모두 반환한 이상 위 피해자에 대한 사기죄가 성립하지 아니함에도, 이를 유죄로 판단한 원심판결에는 사실을 오인하거나 법리를 오해한 위법이 있다.

Article 22(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 2010, Dec. 1, 2011; Presidential Decree No. 2010, Dec. 21, 2011; Presidential Decree No. 2020, Feb. 21, 2011)

However, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty is erroneous by misapprehending the legal principles.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one year and four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on misconception of facts or misapprehension of legal principles

(a) The fraud of the borrowed money (1-A in original judgment), the fraud of the paid-in money (1-b and C in original judgment), the victim C's breach of trust (2-a-b in original judgment), and the victim L.