A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 16, 2019, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol in front of 01:40 on the Daegu Northern apartment Cdong, 112, while drunked a taxi engineer with alcohol, and received a report from E and the background leading up to the notification from the Do District of the Daegu Gangseo-gu Police Station D District called the “police suitability, equal damage,” and the “F’s body” were tightly pushed off and removed, thereby committing assaulting the E’s body and blocking the patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of work log and a detailed statement of 112 reported cases;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: One to five years of imprisonment;

2. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of types] of the obstruction of performance of official duties: [Type 1] No person shall be subject to the obstruction of performance of official duties or coercion of official duties [the scope of recommended areas and recommendations] (the scope of recommended areas and recommendations] basic area, six months to one year and six months.

3. Determination of sentence: Determination of sentence shall be made in full view of the following circumstances and the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, circumstances after the commission of the crime, and various conditions of sentencing as shown in the arguments in this case:

Unfavorable circumstances: Crimes are inferior in light of the contents of crimes.

In order to establish the law and order of the state and eradicate the light of the public authority, strict punishment on the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties is needed.

The favorable circumstances are confession and reflective.

It is an initial crime that has no criminal power.