A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

All applications filed by applicants for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

1. In each insurance company’s insurance company’s terms and conditions that each insurance contractor (the insurer) believe only the contents of the diagnosis issued by the hospital, the certificate of entrance discharge, the certificate of surgery, etc. with respect to the necessity of hospitalization, the propriety of the period of hospitalization, etc., and pay the insurance money to the insurance contractor, the Defendant planned to acquire the insurance money by exaggeration the degree of pains or by appealing false pains, even though it is not necessary for hospital treatment as a disease that can be provided for hospital treatment.

From February 13, 2007 to March 13, 2007, the Defendant subscribed to approximately 1-month insurance from August 31, 2009 to around 1-month from September 29, 2009, the Defendant concentrated on 10 insurance companies with total of 11 guarantee insurance policies, including subscribing to Non-Distribution Multi-Ssch Rexroth (Life) and Non-Distribution (Life Security) Insurance Co., Ltd.

The details of the above insurance products covered by the Defendant were designed to pay the average of KRW 14 million per day of hospitalization by paying the maximum of KRW 160,000 per day from the daily cost of hospitalization to the maximum of KRW 730,000 per day when hospitalized by disease.

On February 3, 2010, the Defendant, at the location of Dongyang Lifelong, located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, stated a claim for insurance money along with a letter of confirmation and diagnosis stating that “The Defendant was hospitalized at a hospital in the name of flusium 620-56 and flusium flusium flusium in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and the name of flusium at a university flusium hospital from October 1, 2009 to February 2, 2010,” thereby deceiving the employees of Dongyang Lifelong, Co., Ltd. as if the Defendant was hospitalized at the hospital normally.

However, in fact, the defendant, even though there is no need for hospital treatment due to the possibility of hospital treatment, makes an exaggeration of the degree of pain or appeal for false pain.