Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for ten months, respectively.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment has become final.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the head of the F newspaper station and the actual representative of the third floor of the building in the Gyeonggi-gu E-gu, Gyeonggi-do, and the defendant A works as the head of the same newspaper general headquarters.

The Defendants found the construction removal site, and conspired to receive a large amount of advertising expenses from the food business operator who received a report on a civil petition that occurred in the course of waste disposal from the construction removal site, and to the effect that, if an image advertisement is given to the Korean newspaper company, they do not file a complaint with the relevant government office, and if advertising is not made, they will inform the relevant government office of the accusation or criticism engineer.

Defendant B, according to the above public offering relation, around 11:30 on January 15, 2013, at HA construction site, where the victim G (the age of 48) works, Defendant B: (a) sought from an employee I an illegal act in relation to waste treatment; (b) around 13:00 on the 18th day of the same month, Defendant A sought the horses of the above FF office and filed a complaint with an administrative agency against the victim who found himself at the above FF office at around 13:00 on the 13th day of the same month; and (c) sought from the victim, who heard the horses of the above FF office; (d) sought a tort during the process of waste treatment; and (e) made an accusation against the administrative agency. To this extent, the case is subject to business suspension for a period of one month or two months. Our newspaper company’s 36 million won, two million won, two million won, two million won, one million won, and two million won.”

The Defendants jointly conspired with the above conspiracy and attempted to join the victim and receive the above advertising expenses. However, the Defendants failed to comply with the above conspiracy and failed to achieve the intent of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Each legal statement of witness G and I;

1. Defendant A's protocol of interrogation of the suspect against Defendant B (three times, four times).