The judgment below

Of the facts charged against Defendant E, G, and N and the part against Defendant J, the judgment of the court below was 2010Kadan4706.

1. Progress of judgment and scope of judgment of this court;

A. 1) The lower court found the Defendants guilty of the violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint destruction and damage, etc.) against Defendant N among the facts charged against the Defendants, and of obstruction of business as of March 25, 201, and found the Defendants guilty of the remainder of the facts charged, and found Defendant E and G guilty of the remainder of the facts charged, with a suspended sentence of four years and six months, a suspended sentence of one year, a suspended sentence of two years for Defendant N, a suspended sentence of two years, a suspended sentence of one year, and a suspended sentence of one year for Defendant N, a violation of Articles 2010Da4706 as of the judgment of the lower court, and a violation of Articles 5, 7, 9 through 11, a crime under Articles 15, 16, and 17 (hereinafter referred to as “the

(2) On the one-year suspended sentence, two years of suspended sentence, and the first, and 7 through 12 of the 201 Highest April 4178 Cases as indicated in the holding of the court below (hereinafter referred to as “second part of the original trial”).

(2) On the grounds of erroneous determination or misapprehension of legal principles and unreasonable sentencing, the Defendants appealed from the acquittal portion on the grounds of erroneous determination of facts or misapprehension of legal principles. 2) Prior to the remanding of the judgment below, the Defendants rejected the Defendants and the prosecutor’s allegation of unfair sentencing, and reversed the conviction portion of the judgment below and sentenced Defendant E and G to a suspended sentence of three years for a two-year period of imprisonment, a suspended sentence of ten months for a ten-month period of imprisonment, and a suspended sentence of two years for a ten-month period of imprisonment for the first portion of the judgment of the court below, and two years for a two-month period of imprisonment for the second portion of the judgment of the court below, respectively.

Therefore, among the judgment of conviction before remanding the case, the Defendants filed an appeal against the aforementioned acquittal portion on the grounds of misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles as to the criminal facts of the 2010 Godan4706 case in the judgment of the court below, and the part of paragraphs (2), (4), (8) through (10), and (12 of the 201 Godan4178 case in the judgment of the court below.

3. The Supreme Court.