1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Circumstances and basic facts of the disposition;

A. On September 26, 1963, the Plaintiff served in Vietnam War, while discharged on December 17, 1966.

B. On August 27, 199, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for high blood pressure, urine diseases, and liver diseases as defoliants diseases pursuant to the Act on Assistance to Patients from Actual or Potential Diseases, Etc. and Establishment of Related Associations (hereinafter “Gaccination Act”). The Plaintiff was found to have been aware of high blood pressure and urine diseases caused by potential aftereffects of defoliants, and was judged to have been saccinary by high blood pressure complications ( minor and minor saccinism).

On May 29, 2002, as a result of the physical examination conducted in accordance with the amended defoliant Act, the person was judged out of the grade for the urine disease, and the high blood pressure was determined as a result of the high blood pressure codification.

C. On August 2010, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “satisfying satitis on the left side,” and received treatment from around that time to 2011 by the Busan Veterans Hospital and B Hospital due to the satch agricultural satitis, and received the satfying satitis in the human mission.

On January 25, 2016, the Plaintiff submitted an application document for physical reexamination for re-verification based on the medical certificate issued by B Hospital.

The above diagnosis was written with the content that “in the state of a human mission after multiple operations have been conducted due to slick slick slick slick slickosis, which may interfere with walking as a condition of a human mission after the surgery.” In addition, the left slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick s

On February 25, 2016, the Busan Veterans Hospital, which is a physical examination institution, presented the opinion that "no opinion is expressed about the conditions of the operation of the stosstostostostostostos tostostos tostostos tostostos tostostos tostos tostos tostos tostos tostos tostos tostos tostos tostos tostos tostos tos tos tos to

Based on this, on June 17, 2016, the Defendant rendered a judgment below rating against urology (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff.

(e).