1. The plaintiff assistant intervenor's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Intervenor.

purport.

1. Basic facts

A. With respect to D vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicles”), the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded each comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to E vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant vehicles”).

B. On December 1, 2017, the Plaintiff’s Intervenor, the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “ Intervenor”), proceeding one lane in front of the Gonyang-gu, Goyang-gu F on the right side of the G on the Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu, and stopped on two-lanes in order to enter the right side of the road, and there was an accident of collision between the Defendant’s upper part on the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle and the lower part on the right side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

C. On January 31, 2018, the Plaintiff paid a total of KRW 1,210,500 to the Intervenor as repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 8, 10 evidence, Eul evidence 1 to 5, video, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s and the Intervenor’s assertion that the Plaintiff’s vehicle was making a normal round at the time of the instant accident, but the Defendant’s vehicle parked on the two-lanes failed to discover the Plaintiff’s vehicle that was making a round by neglecting the duty of front section and left section and left section and left section, and went into a sudden front section. The instant accident occurred due to the negligence of the Defendant’s vehicle, and thus, the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff the KRW 1,210,500 that was paid at the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the damages for delay.

B. The Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant’s vehicle was at the time of the instant accident, and was in the state of stop in line with the signal stop signals, and was normally proceeding. However, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was at the first lane, rather than the second lane, and did not discover the Defendant vehicle and shock the Defendant vehicle. The instant accident occurred due to the Plaintiff’s fault, and thus, the Defendant’s accident occurred.