1. Defendant G and Defendant I shared with Plaintiff A, 66,91,083 won, Plaintiff B, 134,909,500 won, and Plaintiff C 1,873.

The plaintiffs' claim indication of the plaintiffs' claim against the defendant G is not easy to lease or install a product corresponding to the total number of products purchased by the victims, even if they receive money from the victims including the plaintiffs for the purpose of investment in medical device leasing business, and it is unclear whether the rental profit is low and whether the success of their invested business is likely to occur in the future. As such, since it is inevitable to pay dividends agreed upon to senior investors with the investment proceeds of junior investors, it is well known that the payment of dividends to junior investors would not be made if the lower-tier investors' investment limit is caused by the limit, and thus, even if they received money from the victims, they receive the money from the plaintiffs, even though they did not have the intent or ability to continue to pay the money, and thus they seek compensation for such money

In a judgment by applicable provisions of law and by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act), the Plaintiffs claim against Defendant G for delay damages at a rate of 20% per annum from May 9, 2014 to the date of full payment after the date of the tort in this case. However, the Plaintiffs’ claim amount under the written application for correction of the final claim of this case (as of June 24, 2015) was either equal to or reduced from the claim amount entered in the complaint in this case.

The record reveals that the Defendant reached July 15, 2014, and it is reasonable to set the amount of delay damages at the rate of 5% per annum as stipulated in the Civil Act from May 9, 2014 to October 14, 2015, which is the date of the adjudication of this case where it is deemed reasonable for the said Defendant to dispute over the existence or scope of the obligation to perform the instant case from May 9, 2014. Thus, the part demanding delay damages exceeding the above 5% per annum is dismissed.

Defendant G is the fact that the judgment on the plaintiffs' remaining defendants' claims is recognized.