logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2018.04.26 2017나24565
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain in this judgment are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the cases where a part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is changed as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Parts to be dried;

A. On January 10, 2013, the part of the fourth 3-4 of the judgment of the court of first instance stating that "the plaintiff appealed with the Busan High Court 2012Na50179, but the appeal was dismissed on January 10, 2013," "after the plaintiff appealed with the Busan High Court 2012Na50179, the appellate court asserted forgery or alteration as to the statement of this case and tort in the official duties of the registry official, and the Busan High Court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal on January 10, 2013."

B. The fifth 12-13 of the judgment of the court of first instance held that the Defendants jointly and severally held that “The Defendants incurred damages equivalent to KRW 710,000,000,000 due to a tort, and thus, the Defendants jointly and severally incurred damages equivalent to KRW 710,000,000 due to the tort,” and that the Defendants incurred mental damages due to the lapse of 14 years after the forgery or alteration of the instant statement of this case occurred. As such, the Defendants jointly and severally held that the Defendants constituted part of the damages or consolation money due to the tort.”

(c) Part 6 of the first instance court's first instance court's decision "However, the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 10, 15, 16, and 16 are written only," with the evidence submitted by the plaintiff to this court, such as the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 10, 15, 16, and 30, and all the circumstances in the arguments."

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow