logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.13 2016고단1528
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine for 4,000,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On December 30, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime committed by the Seoul Central District Court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on January 7, 2016.

[2] In collusion with AL and AM, the Defendant: (a) served as the head of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dtel 405, 425, 612, 805, 923, and 1508 as the head of the place of business for the operation of the above AL operation from June 2014 to October 20, 2014; (b) advertised the above place of business on the Internet website, such as “AO”; (c) received an amount equivalent to KRW 1.50,00 from the customers who find the place of business; and (d) assisted female employees to have sexual intercourse with customers in the above subparagraphs, thereby arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copy of each protocol concerning the examination of suspect by the prosecution against AM and AL;

1. Copies of each protocol concerning the examination of the police officers in relation to AM, AP, Q and AL;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. The Ministry of Business;

1. Investigation report (review results of mobile analysis);

1. Investigation report (specific reasons for and details of the period of crime by the suspect);

1. Two copies of the written judgment (Seoul Central District Court 2015 High Order 4064, Seoul Central District Court 2015No 3793);

1. Evidence and photographs of sexual traffic establishments;

1. Details on dialogue between the operation of the victim and the suspect AM's sexual traffic business establishments;

1. Previous convictions as indicated in the judgment: Investigation report (verification of concurrent relations after Article 37 of the Criminal Act), one written judgment (Seoul Central District Court 2015 order 7137 high order), summary information inquiry, and application of criminal history-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of a sentence of imprisonment with labor or a fine concurrently (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc.);

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the scope of recommendations) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment [the scope of recommendations] shall be the brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic crimes subject to 19 years of age or older.

arrow