logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.06.19 2013고단7062
도박개장
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. Defendant A and B co-principal are the president of the IE in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, and Defendant B is a person in a de facto marital relationship with Defendant A.

Defendant

A between March 2, 2012 and October 10 of the same month, from the above IC to the above J, one name K, one name K, and L, etc., as the source of the said IC, and caused the IB to go through the IC with a 10 million won worth at the Han-ro market, and Defendant B was at the interest rate of 10% as a result of lending the IB chips equivalent to KRW 10 million per one piece of red chips and a chips equivalent to KRW 10 million per one sheet.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to allow C et al. to install internal Baduk at the above Igs operated by them, or to lend the board money, and to open gambling for profit by receiving interest.

B. From March 2, 2012 to the 10th day of the same month, Defendant C dumpeded from the IMO located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with one million won from the J, one life K, L, and one million won from the mar, and 10 million won from the marb in the mar, and used a stone and white stone to 9 marbs and 361 margs on the marg, and made a marbial marg in the marg, and made a marbial mard from the marg in a way that a large number of people gather.

2. Determination

A. (1) With respect to the crime of gambling by Defendant A and B, the burden of proving the facts charged in a criminal trial is to be borne by the public prosecutor, and the recognition of the facts charged should be proved to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt (Article 307 of the Criminal Procedure Act). If the facts charged were not proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt, the suspicion of guilt is against the Defendant even if

Even if it is not guilty, it shall be judged.

(2) In this regard, the witness C’s investigative agency and the Defendant A and B made a statement in this court to the IMO, which correspond to this part of the facts charged, have C establish a gambling room in the Iz.

arrow