The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Around 00:15 on December 5, 2019, the defendant in the factory room stated that he was the victim who stopped in front of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B Apartment, and paid the passenger car fee to the passenger who used the above taxi to arrive at the destination after having arrived at the taxi in the taxi for D business purpose in front of the victim's D business purpose in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim stated that he was "I will pay for the son. I will pay for the son. I will pay for the son. I will. I do... I..........................." The victim's face is hick at one time by drinking, and the victim's head is fleeped with his left hand, and the victim's head is flurd with his head, so long as the victim's head was flurd with his head's hair, and the victim's head is unburd with his head's hair.

Provided, That the above facts charged shall not be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act, as a crime falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act.

According to the written agreement bound in the trial records, the fact that the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on January 10, 2020, which was after the institution of the prosecution.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.