The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment and additional collection) on the defendant is too unlimited and unfair.

2. It is recognized that the circumstances such as the fact that the Defendant made a confession of the entire crime of this case and reflects his mistake, and that the investigation agency made a statement to the Defendant as to E in selling merptopy (hereinafter “prophone”) to the Defendant.

However, the crime of this case is deemed to have been administered by the defendant after purchasing approximately 0.03g of philopon from E. In light of the method and contents of the crime, etc., the defendant has been sentenced to eight criminal punishment for the same crime. In particular, on June 29, 201, the defendant was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment due to a violation of the Narcotics Control Act in the Changwon District Court's Jinju Support, etc., and on June 12, 2012, the crime of this case constitutes a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (i.e., imprisonment with prison labor for not more than three months on February 6, 2013) and was sentenced to four months for the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime; (ii) imprisonment with prison labor for the same and similar crimes; (iii) imprisonment with prison labor for the same or similar crimes; and (v) imprisonment with prison labor for not more than three years after the sentence of the lower court; and (v) imprisonment with prison labor for the same or similar crimes, motive and method and method of the instant crime.