1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

(b) 1,760,000 won and from February 22, 2018.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 19, 2017, the Plaintiff leased a lease deposit of 25 million won, monthly rent of 3960,000 won (including additional tax, monthly payment on 22th day of each month), and the lease term of 3 years until February 14, 2022, respectively.

B. On February 21, 2017, the sub-lease C sub-leaseed the instant real estate to the Defendant with the consent of the Plaintiff with the same content as the said lease contract.

C. Since the payment of KRW 500,000,000 on October 26, 2017, C in arrears continued to delay the payment of rent for the said subparagraph E.

In addition, as of December 22, 2017, C and the Defendant delayed the payment of the instant real estate (D) as of December 22, 2017. However, on January 9, 2018, the Defendant paid 500,000 won to the Plaintiff additionally and reduced the overdue amount to 8.8 million won, but as of January 22, 2018, the overdue amount exceeded the monthly rent for three months as of January 22, 2018.

On January 19, 2018, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant and C a letter verifying that “each of the above lease agreements is terminated on the grounds of overdue rent,” and the said mail reached C and the Defendant around that time.

(The main text of the notice sent to C was specified only in E, but the lease contract for the real estate of this case was accompanied by the attached Form; hereinafter referred to as the "certification of contents of this case"). [The ground for recognition: the fact that there is no dispute, each entry of Gap evidence 1 through 11 (including paper numbers), and the whole purport of oral argument]

2. The assertion and judgment

A. In the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, it appears that the Plaintiff had expressed his/her intent to continuously “a termination of each of the above lease agreements on the grounds of delinquency in rent” from the time the mail verifying the content of the instant case was sent to the present time, and the Defendant also expressed his/her intention to the present time.