logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.09.14 2016가단5212930
사용료
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company established for the purpose of research and development of a mobile linkage business process program (hereinafter “A”) and changed the trade name to “A” corporation, and the Defendant and D jointly established the E (hereinafter “E”) and conducted a proxy driving business in the name of “F”.

B. On August 31, 2012, the Defendant entered into an entrustment contract with G to the effect that “the Defendant or the person designated by G shall transfer the phone numbers related to F agency driving held by the Defendant or the Defendant to the person designated by G or G, and shall pay KRW 55 million per month to the Defendant while operating the G agency driving business upon entrustment (hereinafter “instant entrustment contract”) by transferring the phone numbers related to F agency driving to the person designated by G or G, and that “E shall transfer the F agency driving business to H (hereinafter “H”).

C. E or H did not pay the Plaintiff totaling KRW 73,170,331 of the program usage fees from April 1, 2012 to October 31, 2012 while using a substitute driving program developed by the Plaintiff. They did not refund KRW 10,000,000 of the Plaintiff’s text messages sent in advance.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant usage fee, etc.”) D by aggregating the said usage fee and the instant text messages cost.

On the other hand, on December 4, 2012, H filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff seeking compensation for damages from H by blocking access to the program on the grounds of the failure to pay the fees for the substitute driving program supplied to E (Seoul District Court 2012Kadan101776). On April 2, 2013, H filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff claiming payment of KRW 83,170,31 (Seoul District Court 2013Kadan89660).

Accordingly, the Busan District Court on July 4, 2013 in the process of the case above 2012Kadan10776.

arrow