A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On May 25, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment for a violation of the Railroad Safety Act at the Gwangju District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the former prison on December 17, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. Around 22:00 on February 3, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the front corridor of the 6th floor office in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, D Public Notice No. 22:00; (b) on the ground that the victim E requested that “the music will be impreced so that it can be impreced;” (c) the victim E, who is the manager of the given telecing telecing telecing telecing, he was able to talk with the large interest of “brecing strings, strings, and strings”; (d) the Defendant was able to take the head of the victim F (51) who is a resident of the telecing telecing from the corridor, booming the body of the young at the time when the Defendant was able to boom and head, she was unable to cause disturbance to the police, making the victim’s desire to burd, and making it known to the residents.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim E’s notification tele business for about 45 minutes by force, and assaulted the victim F.

2. Defluoring the Defendant, at the police station G office of the Suwon Seo-gu Police Station located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si on February 3, 2018, in order to arrest a flagrant offender for committing a crime listed in the preceding paragraph and undergo an investigation, the Defendant debrising down the floor of the Defendant, who is a public official of the foregoing G police, in the victim H who was a police officer of the said G, and with the police officers of the other cases, “fluoring the Defendant’s disease” against the victim while there is a police officer of the said G;

C. Marriage;

In the event that it is as soon as Narna and is discarded as Narna, it is necessary to do so in governance, as the Paris day.

In a large sense, “the victim was openly insultingd” due to the following: (a) the victim was openly insulting.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and H:

1. Each statement of E and I;

1. Complaint;

1. A criminal investigation report (CCTV image investigation);

1. Previouss before judgment: References to inquiries, investigation reports (suspect A.