1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. Of the appeal costs, the part arising between the Plaintiffs and the Defendants.

1. The grounds for appeal by the Defendants cited in the judgment of the court of first instance are the same purport as the Defendants in the court of first instance. The evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance (the Defendants asserted that each loan certificate submitted by the Plaintiffs to Gap 1-1-3 was forged for the first time in the court of first instance, but in light of the overall purport of the entries and arguments in the evidence No. 1-4 and No. 3-1-3-3, it is reasonable to deem that the part of the J’s seal affixed to the debtor column of the above loan certificate was affixed with the seal according to the intention of the court of first instance. Thus, the authenticity of each of the above documents is presumed to have been established, and there is no other evidence sufficient to acknowledge the facts of forgery of each of the above documents, and thus, the above assertion by the Defendants cannot be accepted).

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is consistent with the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the dismissal or deletion as set forth below (Provided, That the part concerning co-defendant F of the first instance court, which was separately determined, is excluded) and it is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 8 7 and 8 "Defendant F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant F") shall be raised to "Co-Defendant F of the first instance trial".

In Part 9, "the establishment registration of the establishment of the creation of the neighboring establishment of the instant case" was completed by "the establishment registration of the establishment of each neighboring establishment of the instant case."

The "Defendant D, E, G, H, and I" shall be described as "Defendants", respectively, in heading 7 and 11.

Part 11. Sub-section 16. Sub-section 16.3. Sub-section 16.

Part 11 "Defendant D, E, and F" in Part 17 shall be changed to "Defendant D, E, and E".

Part 9-9 through 12 and part 13 through 15 shall be deleted.

2. Accordingly, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the Defendants is justified, and the Defendants’ appeal is without merit.