A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

1. On December 2013, 2013, the Defendant purchased bitampacters (one philopon; hereinafter referred to as “copon”) who are psychotropic drugs, using 100,000 won and flopon flopon flopon flopon flopon flopon flopon flopon flopon flopon copon

2. At around 16:00 on the same day, the Defendant administered philophones by driving philophones purchased from the Defendant’s house located in Daegu Jung-gu E in the manner of clocking the philophones on beer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Response to the request for appraisal;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning investigation reports (related to investigation reports on the upper line D);

1. Articles 60 (1) 2, 4 (1) 1, and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. of Specific Crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment is the first-class crime [the scope of recommending punishment] of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, including the sale and purchase mediation, etc. of the second-class crimes (the scope of recommending punishment), the number of self-denunciation [the special mitigation persons], the second-class crime of cooperation in investigation (the scope of recommending punishment] of types 3 (b) medication, simple possession, etc. (the range of recommending punishment), the number of self-denunciation (the period of March 1, 196) and the last sentence due to the special mitigation area (the period of March 2 (the period of March 2 (b) and (c)) of the Act: April 2 and March 3 [the sentence] of this case even though the defendant had the same power on several occasions, it led to the crime of this case. However, the fact that the defendant surrenders himself to the narcotics investigation business, the defendant's mistake is divided, and other circumstances such as the motive, motive, method and circumstances before and circumstances before and after the crime of this case.