logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.10.17 2019고단2546
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business with the trade name "C" from Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B and the fourth floor.

From February 19, 2019 to February 21, 2019, the Defendant employed Thai Women D and two female employees, and provided guidance to the room where sexual traffic takes place by receiving 90,000 won from the male descendants who found the said room in return for sexual traffic, and let the said female employees enter the said room and sexual intercourse with the male grandchildren, or cause them to investigate the sexual organ of the male grandchildren with their losses.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for report on internal investigation (on-site enforcement status and attachment of photographs);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the types of sexual traffic crimes subject to the age of not less than 19 and the basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the types of the punishment according to the sentencing guidelines, including the brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic (referring to the mediation, etc. of sexual traffic by giving and

2. Determination of sentence shall take into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects his mistake; (b) the Defendant did not have the same criminal record; and (c) other factors of sentencing as indicated in the instant records and arguments, such as the business period, age, occupation and environment of the Defendant; and (d) other factors of sentencing.

arrow