Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around August 27, 2012, the Defendant is a person with intellectual disability 1st degree, and the Defendant established “C” (hereinafter “instant protection center”), which is a protective facility for persons with disabilities intellectually disabled, in the Nam-gu Seoul metropolitan area, around August 27, 2012, along with the Defendant’s wife, who did not look at his or her intellectual disability 1st degree. Around that time, a person operating the instant protection center.

On April 2014, the Defendant: (a) obtained designation of a disabled person who is operated by the Office of Education of the Seoul Metropolitan City Office of Education of the Victim Gwangju; (b) obtained the designation of a school subject to special school education as a school subject to education; and (c) received tuition fees of KRW 90,00 per month from the victim’s budget when the disabled person (disabled person) wishes to attend lectures at the instant protection center after school after school.

Therefore, the Defendant, even though there was no person eligible for special education attending D in fact, did not attend lectures at the instant protection center, submitted false documents, such as a plan, etc. as if he/she attended lectures, and received a budget support from the victims.

On April 2014, the Defendant prepared a false document as if 6 persons, such as E, who are persons eligible for special education of D, were enrolled in D-school courses at the instant protection center three times a week after D-school guidance F, and submitted it to the Office of Education of the Seoul Metropolitan City Office of Victim Gwangju(D) through D.

However, there was no plan for six persons, such as the above E, who were enrolled in D, to attend the course from F, and the defendant was thought to receive subsidies equivalent to KRW 90,00 per month from the damaged person, as if he opened the after-school course.

On April 2014, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 540,00 from the account under the name of the instant protection center in the name of the special sex education subsidy for schools after school after school education from the victim, and thereafter, received KRW 540,00 from around that time.